Jump To Navigation

Real Estate Legal News

News

Mergers and Acquisitions

Read More

Real Estate

Read More

Securities

Read More

Case Summaries

Commercial Law

[09/01] Hollander v. Copacabana Nightclub
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action brought against several New York City nightclubs for discriminating against men on “Ladies’ Nights," dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where the nightclubs were not state actors and thus were not subject to section 1983.

[08/31] Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. v. Yi Da Xin Trading Corp.
In an action seeking to attach defendant's property in New York as pre-judgment security for a pending arbitration in Hong Kong, dismissal of the action for lack of personal jurisdiction is affirmed where the district court did not err in declining to fashion an equitable remedy in circumstances where it was clear that the original attachment order could not be sustained in light of Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd., 585 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 2009).

[08/30] Princo Corp. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n
In plaintiff's patent infringement suit related to two types of digital storage devices, recordable discs (CD-Rs) and rewritable compact discs (CD-RWs), claiming that defendant was violating section 337(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 by importing CD-Rs and CD-RWs that infringed its patents, the International Trade Commission's decision that the doctrine of patent misuse does not bar intervenor-U.S. Philips Corporation from enforcing its patent rights against defendant is affirmed as, even if Phillips and Sony engaged in an agreement not to license the patent at issue for non-Orange-Book purposes, that hypothesized agreement had no bearing on the physical or temporal scope of the patents in suit, nor did it have anti-competitive effects in the relevant market. Therefore, the asserted agreement between Phillips and Sony did not constitute misuse and cannot justify rendering all of Phillips' Orange Book patents unenforceable.

Read More

Probate Trusts

Read More

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Introduction To HMH&O
Helpful Legal Resources

Heideman, McKay, Heugly & Olsen, L.L.C.

Is committed to providing our clients with the most up to date legal news, information and resources. Please also find our helpful sections that offer answers to some of the frequent questions our clients have asked us.

Provo Office
2696 N. University Avenue, Suite 180
Provo, Utah 84604
Phone: 801.812.1000

Map and Directions


Spanish Fork Office
397 North Main Street
Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
Phone: 801 798-8000
Fax: 801 798-1670

Map and Directions

Price Office
1375 South 100 East
Price, Utah 84501
Phone: 435.637.3353

Map and Directions


Ephraim Office
90 South Main Street
Ephraim, UT 84627
Phone: 435-283-8000
Fax: 435-835-4000

Map and Directions

St. George Office
134 North 200 East, Suite #302
St. George, Utah 84770
Phone: 435.656.3696

Map and Directions
MasterCard Visa AmEx DiscoverE-Newsletter

Heideman, McKay, Heugly & Olsen, L.L.C., provides legal advice and representation for business owners and corporate clients in communities throughout Provo, Orem, Sandy, Draper, Salt Lake City, St. George, Alpine, Highland, Lehi and Price.


View Our Disclaimer : E-Mail Page : Print Page : Save Page : Maps and Directions